Post by SongRune on 2022-09-09 19:31:51
Warth has the unfortunate truth. To explain how they "detected" your cheating is to explain how to bypass the detection, and an actual cheat programmer would sound exactly like you did, when they were fishing. In the end they can't tell.
I won't say that their systems are good, however, and there should be a good effort made to make sure the systems are working correctly and have a low false positive rate, but unless you give up on catching cheaters at all, you will always risk making mistakes.
It's unfortunate that mistakes can't be explained, discussed and rectified, but secrecy is a hard requirement in this field. Anti-cheat is spy vs spy, and so sadly, they don't get a choice to be open.
I won't say that their systems are good, however, and there should be a good effort made to make sure the systems are working correctly and have a low false positive rate, but unless you give up on catching cheaters at all, you will always risk making mistakes.
It's unfortunate that mistakes can't be explained, discussed and rectified, but secrecy is a hard requirement in this field. Anti-cheat is spy vs spy, and so sadly, they don't get a choice to be open.