Attacking your citizens is bad

We have not received permission from Strevi to share the quoted post.

Bad faith actors...

Internal disputes that could be handled by easy PvP conflicts...

If we can't throw someone out of a Node by 'vote' or something, might need a method for dealing with them...

I'm fine with increased penalties for attacking them. I'm fine with GREATLY increased penalties such as corruption or anything else someone wants to come up with.

In some cases intra-node PvP will be a SOLUTION to internal node strife, not a problem. In others it will be borderline harrassment (not true harrassment because they could leave and that's the whole point of doing it).

I prefer if we're able to do it generally, unless we're going to make entire 'police' systems within the game code to grant specific players the Monopoly on Internal-Node Violence.

EDIT: Clarification - speaking only for myself, NOT for my group, in this thread. They may be along.

I'd probably link this to Intrepid's reasoning for inability to flag on your party/guild/ally/raid-mates. Intrepid say they want node relationships to pretty much supersede all the other ones. So why can we flag on node-mates, but not on others?

If inability to flag is there to prevent exploits of some kind - does this not apply to nodemates too? And if it doesn't apply to them then I think Intrepid should stop saying that node relationships are more important than guild/ally ones.

We have not received permission from Strevi to share the quoted post.

I want to be able to kill anyone I want. But there's certain abuses related to that kind of freedom. Intrepid decided to limit those abuses to a certain extent and I want to hear the exact reasoning, so I can make a decision whether I agree with it and whether it would apply to node relationships as well.