Post by Ludullu on 2023-04-08 00:53:37
I could maybe see this working, but only if it requires a truly huge scale operation by a ton of people, with maybe even the closest node involved. Otherwise this could be abused to all hell, and not even in relation to caravans.
Maybe if it was a "this hole closed, but now this one opened up instead" kind of deal and caravanners would need to change their route on the fly - then yeah, this might be interesting and would put more variety into caravans. Though this reeks of even more attacker benefits, which would probably result in a shitty overall design, cause at least right now I'm still not sure how exactly do attackers suffer any real losses if they lose their attack on the caravan, while they have literally everything to win.
Maybe if it was a "this hole closed, but now this one opened up instead" kind of deal and caravanners would need to change their route on the fly - then yeah, this might be interesting and would put more variety into caravans. Though this reeks of even more attacker benefits, which would probably result in a shitty overall design, cause at least right now I'm still not sure how exactly do attackers suffer any real losses if they lose their attack on the caravan, while they have literally everything to win.