We have not received permission from Dygz to share the quoted post.
And that's exactly why I went from cosmetics to gear pieces. Cause "meaningful to you" can mean whateverthefuck.
We have not received permission from Dygz to share the quoted post.
But that's you applying your knowledge of the potential Ashes design to the suggestion, while everyone else took the suggestion at its face value. That being "what it was in wow", because that's what the OP referenced. Yes, I could project AoC's design on whatever feature I know, but usually when someone uses an example from another game, w/o explicitly stating details - they mean the exact feature they're referencing and not what it might be in the game. And the very first sentence from OP is literally "I'd like to hear peoples yes or no answers to if a mage tower would be a cool addition to the base game". There's no indication that they're trying to change that feature to fit the Ashes design. That sentence tells me "I think this exact thing could be a good addition to the game".
And I personally dunno how that whole first message can be read in any other way. Which is exactly why Mag aggroed on you "defending" OP's suggestion. Yes, you said that it could be different, but then, by definition, it would stop being "Mage Tower". It'd just be a one-off instance that gives some small thing (considering what's been stated about Ashes instances), at which point it's very arguable whether that small thing can be considered "meaningful".