Re: The problem with having “Tank” as a class name

I think Mitigater sounds way cooler than Tank and would lead to far less frustrating and confusing instances than the current implementation would. If you really want to compare fighter and ranger to tank, that or Defender are the far more reasonable linguistic comparisons.

Not that it matters. As long as people argue 'Steven said he's not changing it' and use that as an excuse to support all of his terrible name choices (Spellmancer? really?) this 'conversation' is the opposite of discourse.

I'll continue to recommend cooler names though. It's a free Bingo space.

This threads' class is clearly Death Knight not tank.