Will Dwarf designs get beefier and wider?

We have not received permission from Shergrim to share the quoted post.

Its probably going to stay that way till they focus more on fleshing out races and the character creator. They probably have things set this way to test mobility (Nikua flip jump) and more standardized hit boxes.

We have not received permission from Decidendi to share the quoted post.

I hope Dünir get that expressive possibility as well. I think the current model is also fine but on the light/small side. The beards and details, have improved between certain builds leading me to believe they have been hearing peoples' concerns; I believe it's just a bit more effort/not as helpful to testing to change the model sizes/hitboxes at this stage as it would muddy test results. We will get to the stage where they need those tests though. Hopefully by alpha 2.

We have not received permission from Dygz to share the quoted post.

It happened in a build after a large amount of discussion and negative opinion on the current design was voiced. I choose to believe this was the reason. Your free to be like other people you dislike and have no faith in the devs if you want. I choose to believe their current promise of transparency and a desire for our input so they can act on it.

We have not received permission from Dygz to share the quoted post.

I didn't say 'solved the concern'. I was expressing that the build shifted with those changes at a time it would have made sense to from a community management perspective in a way that was reasonable during testing. The fact that they had changes on deck to provide in such a situation doesn't really negate my perspective at all...

But ok dygz. Since your 'so in the know' I will not use that particular thing as evidence of that again.

Also next time you have evidence as to why you think something is the way it is that won't violate an nda to reveal, lead with it instead of withholding it until someone actually pushes you. If Intrepid intends to be transparent and leaks something to you, it's your obligation to be equally transparent. The last thing they need is people getting a dumb false impression of favoritism.

We have not received permission from Dygz to share the quoted post.

I'm sorry to hear that.

If you think you aren't responsible for being transparent.... I find it odd they'd willingly partner with someone who holds that stance and attempts to negate someone's positive perception of their company. Well that'll bear it's own fruit I suppose.

And since you have gotten to the point where it is apparent to me that you weren't able to understand what I meant in the first place, consider this particular exchange wrapped up. Feel free to consider me 'brought down to earth.'

Where is that pic from, I love it