Corruption/pvp

Azherae wrote: »

You say that but it's more like certain people are reverse-trolling, cause you have had long discussions with many of those same people for the same reasons.

Could be. Though it does feel like semantics are Noaani's specialty. Or maybe I just pay more attention to when Noaani discusses them and don't notice when I argue the same stuff.

NiKr wrote: »

Azherae wrote: »

You say that but it's more like certain people are reverse-trolling, cause you have had long discussions with many of those same people for the same reasons.

Could be. Though it does feel like semantics are Noaani's specialty. Or maybe I just pay more attention to when Noaani discusses them and don't notice when I argue the same stuff.

It'd be that. Or rather that Noaani cares for longer and you don't.

For instance, Mag7's last post. One could ignore the 'I bet you don't even play these games!', one could ignore the 'you should try to take things more seriously and use real logic', you could ignore the blatant logical error in paragraph 2 (even my parser can).

But the 'You are wrong because my definition of PvP is different from yours and nearly everyone else's' is harder to ignore because it sticks out, not just as a difference in discussion but as a pure contradiction. You'd have to have 'trained' to explicitly ignore the contradictions to not have it irk you, if you're already a certain type of person.

I'd be 'required' to call it out if I was still 'on duty', personally.

We have not received permission from Noaani to share the quoted post.

That would be a veeeery long search But I'm fairly sure you aren't. We just got an eclectic group of posters on this forum.

I keep coming back to the reddit post of "every poster on the internet is a crazy person in one way or the other". It remains true still.

We have not received permission from Mag7spy to share the quoted post.

Or as I like to say.

"In light of your argument, I stand correct."

"Don't you mean... corrected?"

"...no."