Thx.We have not received permission from JamesSunderland to share the quoted post.
Taking later comments here into context, I'd say I just disagree with EQ2's whole approach and your preference of it.We have not received permission from Noaani to share the quoted post.
Taking later comments here into context, I'd say I just disagree with EQ2's whole approach and your preference of it.We have not received permission from Noaani to share the quoted post.
I'm a visual learner, so I want to see what the boss/mob does. I'm not talking about ground indicators or whatever, but the effects/animations should be visible imo.
Intrepid have the opportunity to build their models with the feature you're talking about in mind. Give those models the ability to perform a super wide variety of animations. And those animations should be comprised of steps that could weave other abilities into them with proper visual representation of that new ability.
In other words, once again, do better. And my attitude towards this is also why I say that I don't want devs to try and keep pace with trackered top pve players, because I want a much better quality of content instead of a lot of it (while not overworking devs to death). Invisible skills and non-existent animations are not quality imo.
Was this something I missed or forgot about from A1? Or in what way would the text be the only way to show that there's a skill/mechanic being used by the boss?Eh, chances are we'd still get the text either way though.
Was this something I missed or forgot about from A1? Or in what way would the text be the only way to show that there's a skill/mechanic being used by the boss?Eh, chances are we'd still get the text either way though.
Or do you mean smth along the lines of "the boss is about to/doing a mechanic" written across the screen? Cause L2 had those, but I assumed that this shit was like the bottom tier of pve complexity, so I doubt you're talking about that.
We have not received permission from Ruerik to share the quoted post.
